Dr. Om Prakash Sudrania:

I have been often baffled with the words “Ethics”, “Human Rights”, “Rights of Minorities” and such similar foggy expressions; as also the word “Religion”. I have also seen these words being used selectively by the groups with some underlying vested interests to express and hypothesise their own brand of “Human Rights” maliciously. I saw a similar reason in a report recently and I could not resist my temptation to analyse it.

I just saw a Weekly Digest by the Asian Human Rights Commission of Week 27 which enlists a report on India under the caption:

Military Governance in Indian-administered Kashmir:

(AHRC FORWARDED STATEMENT) From International People's Tribunal on Human rights and Justice in Indian-Administered Kashmir (IPTK):

The full text can be seen on the link: http://newsletters.ahrchk.net/digest/index.php?a=sn&id=712

Having perused the entire report, I am saddened to observe that the partitioned and factionalised fractured role played by AHRC is heavily biased and politically motivated. It is unfortunate that AHRC goes out of the way to comment on President George Bush and Canadian Government but they have deliberately kept silent on the role of Pakistani establishment and the Islamofascism of the various well known Islamic terrorist gangs in the nearby “Epicentre of Terrorism”

They have been pathetically insensitive to the cause of “Human Rights” of the Indian Security Forces who are being killed by these so called non-state actors in Pakistan and Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK). Pakistan greedily invaded the then Kashmir State on 20th October 1947 and forcefully grabbed the current PoK and the other related areas. Millions were butchered by the Jinnah’s instigation. All that part belongs to India.

(Excerpt) Read more at international.to ...

You know what, it really has less to do with Sunni v. Shia or Catholic v. Protestant than certain people taking advantage of real, or perceived injustices.

Last person, or people to hurt you are the natural scapegoat. All the time the natural nature of human activity is one of survival.

In my country, every wing-nut seems to get attention, especially when the the more outrageous the claim, the more attention.

Here, President Kennedy was not murdered by Lee Harvey Oswald.

Civil Rights leader Rev. Martin Luther King was not murdered by convicted Jame Earl Ray.

It was all done by the CIA, FBI or space aliens making trouble for some unknown reason.

In another time, without mass communication, this crap would have gained wey more traction than it deserved.

Always has done!

Radical Islam is killing more Muslims than infidels...

: Religious violence in Malaysia escalates as more churches attacked Religious violence in Malaysia escalated on Sunday after three more churches were attacked in an unprecedented wave of assaults on Christian houses of worship. No one was hurt in the latest upsurge of violence which saw two churches firebombed and a third dubbed with black paint in a row sparked by a court decision allowing non-Muslims to use the word "Allah" in place of God in their literature and worship. Four other churches in Kuala Lumpur were firebombed on Friday and Saturday amid outrage in the Muslim-majority country over the court's move to overturn a government prohibition on the use of Allah by Christians when using the Malay language.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/malaysia/6963436/Religious-violence-in-Malaysia-escal ates-as-more-churches-attacked.html

Seems the Golden Rule isn't very big with these people.

: Karachi blast kills suspected Pakistan militants At least eight killed in apparently accidental explosion of suicide vest stored at house in Taliban stronghold At least eight suspected militants were killed today in a blast apparently caused by an exploding suicide vest stored at a house in Pakistan's commercial capital, Karachi. Senior police official Raja Omar Khatab said the blast may have been caused by a jacket loaded with explosives that is used by suicide attackers. Police found militant literature, but it was unclear which group the militants were affiliated with, he said.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jan/08/karachi-blast-kills-suspected-militants

I hate to waste food.

Just stuff a block of lard up their ass.

Ethnic riots spread in China's west; 140 killed... Police sealed off streets in parts of the provincial capital, Urumqi, after discord between ethnic Muslim Uighur people and China's Han majority erupted into violence. Witnesses reported a new, smaller protest Monday in a second city, Kashgar.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...

Christian Broadcast Network, not a source of information to be taken seriously.

We do not have religious tolerance laws, for good reason.

By our Constitution and tradition, freedom of speech and religion are protected.

It is not to be expected that everybody will be happy all the time, but heck, some people just expect to much.

Australia: Christian Pastors Taken to Court to Silence Criticism of Islam

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ut6avCybQjg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=US&v=9lCaRgaBay0

The Australian Herald reported this story, but within 24hrs it was deleted, why??????

Foreword: On 16th February a court has removed the supression order on naming Brendan Sokaluk. Please keep in mind at this stage he has only been accused and has not been found guilty.

http://ozsoapbox.com/2009/02/15/protecting-the-accused--most-hated-man-in-australia-the-churchill-ar sonist-caught.aspx?ref=rss

"Was it Foley?"

Reports are pouring in from Australia alleging that the death forest fire in which nearly 200 people died was set by an Islamist group which had last year threatened to carry out such a terrorist act.

Suspicions that the worst wildfires ever to strike Australia were deliberately set have already led that nation’s police to declare towns incinerated by blazes to be crime scenes.

Last year in September, Islamic extremists urged Muslims via the Internet to deliberately light bush fires as a weapon of terror.

US intelligence channels identified the website calling on Muslims in Australia, the US, Europe and Russia to “start forest fires”, claiming “scholars have justified chopping down and burning the infidels’ forests when they do the same to our lands.”

The website, posted by a group called the Al-Ikhlas Islamic Network, argues in Arabic that lighting fires is an effective form of terrorism justified in Islamic law under the “eye for an eye” doctrine.

The posting - which instructs jihadis to remember “forest jihad” in summer months - says fires cause economic damage and pollution, tie up security agencies and can take months to extinguish so that “this terror will haunt them for an extended period of time.”

“Imagine if, after all the losses caused by such an event, a jihadist organisation were to claim responsibility for the forest fires,” the website says. “You can hardly begin to imagine the level of fear that would take hold of people in the United States, in Europe, in Russia and in Australia.”

When the report was made, Australian intelligence agencies confirmed that they were treating the possibility of bush fires being used as a weapon of terrorism as “a serious concern.”

The Internet posting by the little-known group claimed the idea of forest fires had been attributed to imprisoned Al Qaeda leader Abu Musab Al-Suri. It said Al-Suri had urged terrorists to use sulphuric acid and petrol to start forest fires.

* The original report on the Jihad fire threat, as published in The Australian newspaper on September 7th last year, was pulled from the Internet by that publication this afternoon. It is worth bearing in mind that as of writing, no firm evidence has yet emerged to claim that recent devastating fire has any Islamist cause.

http://bnp.org.uk/2009/02/australian-death-fire-was-it-jihad/

---

There you go, the usual Islamic follow-up crime, after committing the massacre - (on top of everything) blaming the victims!

What the heck is an "hindu zionist" anyway??? then again, Who said Islamofascism makes sense?

The truth -- however -- is that the Islamists consider any anti terrorists pro-security, pro-survival, pro-life acting "entity" as "zionists", that's IslamiPedia for "Zionism".