Students for Democracy - international political forums - Students4Democracy
  Students4democracy home     Students4democracy - forums     Students4democracy - guestbook  
Register   Login  
 
Students for Democracy Forums - International political debates Active TopicsActive Topics   Forum Search for members only!Search   HelpHelp   Join StudentsforDemocracy - all you need is a username and a passwordRegister   LoginLogin

SfD mailtrap (does not appear in browsers): n.cggsswfs@contact.studentsfordemocracy.net

Tomorrow
 Students for Democracy forums : Tomorrow
Subject Topic: Warming ’greatest scam in history’ Post Reply Post New Topic
 12 Pages  « 1 2 ... 10 11 12 »
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
odin
Bigger than the Beatles
(Troll Task Force)
Bigger than the Beatles
Avatar
Owner of the only deleted Topic

Joined: 25/July/2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 7880

Online Status: Offline
Posted: 16/December/2009 at 20:17 | IP Logged  |  Copy the link in order to refer to this post Quote odin

But experts at the Moscow-based Institute of Economic Analysis say the British dossier used statistics from weather stations that fit its theory of global warming, while ignoring those that do not.

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/146517/Climate-change-lies-by-Britain-

Back to Top View odin's Profile Search for other posts by odin
 
odin
Bigger than the Beatles
(Troll Task Force)
Bigger than the Beatles
Avatar
Owner of the only deleted Topic

Joined: 25/July/2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 7880

Online Status: Offline
Posted: 17/December/2009 at 07:50 | IP Logged  |  Copy the link in order to refer to this post Quote odin

 Climategate 2. University of East Anglia academics at centre of global warming hysteria in new fraud scandal. It is emerging from Russia that the U E A Climate Research Unit has been caught red handed manipulating the data from Russian weather stations. This huge scandal will pile on the pressure now building for a no holds barred review of the entire global warming theory, especially in view of the vast sums of money involved in the carbon credits and carbon capture scams, and the personal financial interests of key individuals such as carbon billionaire Al Gore and wind factory shareholder Chris Davies. Heads will roll.

Direct from Nick Griffin in Copenhagen, more to follow.

http://bnp.org.uk/2009/

 




*********************************************************************
Message inserted by SfD invitation bot:

Think your English is not good enough to post here?
Nobody cares! Just start to post.
Sign up with Studentsfordemocracy - username and password is all you need

*********************************************************************


Edited by odin on 17/December/2009 at 08:05
Back to Top View odin's Profile Search for other posts by odin
 
odin
Bigger than the Beatles
(Troll Task Force)
Bigger than the Beatles
Avatar
Owner of the only deleted Topic

Joined: 25/July/2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 7880

Online Status: Offline
Posted: 19/December/2009 at 20:39 | IP Logged  |  Copy the link in order to refer to this post Quote odin

This all getd better every day.

WASHINGTON (7-15-08) - Mathematical proof that there is no “climate crisis” appears today in a major, peer-reviewed paper in Physics and Society, a learned journal of the 4,600-strong American Physical Society, SPPI reports.

http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/press/proved_no_climate_crisis.html

Back to Top View odin's Profile Search for other posts by odin
 
odin
Bigger than the Beatles
(Troll Task Force)
Bigger than the Beatles
Avatar
Owner of the only deleted Topic

Joined: 25/July/2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 7880

Online Status: Offline
Posted: 20/December/2009 at 17:50 | IP Logged  |  Copy the link in order to refer to this post Quote odin

Back to Top View odin's Profile Search for other posts by odin
 
Mongo
Bigger than the Beatles
(Troll Task Force)
Bigger than the Beatles
Generous donor to SfD!
Avatar
Mongo only pawn in game of life

Joined: 30/September/2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3576

Online Status: Offline
Posted: 28/December/2009 at 23:58 | IP Logged  |  Copy the link in order to refer to this post Quote Mongo

MMGW, what a joke.

 

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1de_1261685642

Back to Top View Mongo's Profile Search for other posts by Mongo
 
headrock
Bigger than the Beatles
(Troll Task Force)
Bigger than the Beatles
Avatar

Joined: 22/September/2003
Location: United States
Posts: 6550

Online Status: Offline
Posted: 01/March/2010 at 15:28 | IP Logged  |  Copy the link in order to refer to this post Quote headrock

Mongo wrote:
MMGW, what a joke.

I think fraud is more appropriate......Its a strange and sad day when i come to have more respect for the BBC and Guardian than any other shitty rag coming out of our country who refuse to report anything that make them look like the jackasses they are......

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/21/sea-level-geoscience-retract-siddall

Quote:
Scientists have been forced to withdraw a study on projected sea level rise due to global warming after finding mistakes that undermined the findings.[ The study, published in 2009 in Nature Geoscience, one of the top journals in its field, confirmed the conclusions of the 2007 report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). It used data over the last 22,000 years to predict that sea level would rise by between 7cm and 82cm by the end of the century.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/IPCC-retracts-2035-alarm-on-Himalayan-glacier-melt/articles how/5482397.cms

Quote:
NEW DELHI: For the first time in its history, the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) — a panel of 2,500 of the best climate scientists in the world — accepted on Wednesday that it had made a huge goof-up in its fourth assessment report on climate change and withdrew its assertion that the Himalayan glaciers ran the risk of being wiped out by 2035.

It admitted that proper ‘‘procedures’’ were not followed while reaching the conclusion


http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/02/23/britains-weather-office-proposes-climategate/

Quote:
At a meeting Monday of 150 climate scientists, representatives of Britain's weather office proposed that the world's climatologists start all over again and produce a new trove of global temperature data that is open to public scrutiny and "rigorous" peer review.

And my favorite of all........

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8511670.stm

Quote:

Phil Jones is director of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA), which has been at the centre of the row over hacked e-mails.

The BBC's environment analyst Roger Harrabin put questions to Professor Jones, including several gathered from climate sceptics. The questions were put to Professor Jones with the co-operation of UEA's press office.

Next time some one accuses you of being a "denier" or guilty of practicing  "pseudo sciene" all you need is one click on the link above..

1)No statistically significant warming from 1998-2009.According to the IPCC and our various other frauds we should be warming at a tick of about 0.2 degrees a decade.OOPS
2)The IPCC might have overestimated climate sensitivity to CO2 and underestimated natural variability??
3)Attributting MMGW to human activity is faulty??
4)The rate and intensity of the current warming isnt exceptional???Weve seen two other periods of similiar warming??

And my favorite of all......

Quote:
It would be supposition on my behalf to know whether all scientists who say the debate is over are saying that for the same reason. I don't believe the vast majority of climate scientists think this. This is not my view. There is still much that needs to be undertaken to reduce uncertainties, not just for the future, but for the instrumental (and especially the palaeoclimatic) past as well.

Buh buh buh wait..I thought the "science was settled"???

 

 


 

Back to Top View headrock's Profile Search for other posts by headrock
 
Brian Foley
Bigger than the Beatles
(Troll Task Force)
Bigger than the Beatles

Refuse - Resist

Joined: 27/September/2003
Location: Tasmania
Posts: 5412

Online Status: Offline
Posted: 05/March/2010 at 21:22 | IP Logged  |  Copy the link in order to refer to this post Quote Brian Foley

odin wrote:

What about President Bush's chief of staff of the Council on Environmental Quality Philip Cooney who altered government climate reports to favor the interests of the oil industry then resigned from the administration to take a job at ExxonMobil?

headrock wrote:
I think fraud is more appropriate......

Yes so do I...
ExxonMobil Disinformation Campaign On Global Warming Science

Its simple mathematics Oil is used for heating. When you burn oil, it heats the air inside your house. If you open a door or window, some of the heated air escapes. Some escapes through seepage. Then the outdoor atmosphere becomes heated.

Quote:
NASA Scientist: Put CEOs On Trial for Global-Warming Lies


June 23: Dr. James Hansen addresses an audience on Capitol Hill. Rep. Edward Markey, D-Mass., sits in the front row at left.

The heads of major fossil-fuel companies who spread disinformation about global warming should be "tried for high crimes against humanity and nature," according to a leading climate scientist.

Dr. James Hansen, director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York, sounded the alarm about global warming in testimony before a Senate subcommittee exactly 20 years ago.

He returned to the topic Monday with a speech at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., given to the Worldwatch Institute, before which he was called a hero by former Sen. Tim Wirth, D-Colo., who headed the 1988 hearing.


You are just unwittingly defending big business from culpability of paying for the clean up of our atmosphere.
Back to Top View Brian Foley's Profile Search for other posts by Brian Foley
 
odin
Bigger than the Beatles
(Troll Task Force)
Bigger than the Beatles
Avatar
Owner of the only deleted Topic

Joined: 25/July/2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 7880

Online Status: Offline
Posted: 06/March/2010 at 07:29 | IP Logged  |  Copy the link in order to refer to this post Quote odin

Brian Foley wrote:
You are just unwittingly defending big business from culpability of paying for the clean up of our atmosphere.

If you think for one minute that big business will get the bill for anyting instead of the tax payer then you have to think again, it is just a scam to bring in the one world govenment paid for by the tax payer.

Back to Top View odin's Profile Search for other posts by odin
 
Brian Foley
Bigger than the Beatles
(Troll Task Force)
Bigger than the Beatles

Refuse - Resist

Joined: 27/September/2003
Location: Tasmania
Posts: 5412

Online Status: Offline
Posted: 06/March/2010 at 14:14 | IP Logged  |  Copy the link in order to refer to this post Quote Brian Foley

odin wrote:

Brian Foley wrote:
You are just unwittingly defending big business from culpability of paying for the clean up of our atmosphere.


If you think for one minute that big business will get the bill for anyting instead of the tax payer then you have to think again, it is just a scam to bring in the one world govenment paid for by the tax payer.


You only have to look at the Tobacco industry to see how this global warming scenario will play out against Industry to see why they are so willing to distort data. Just take the current lawsuit Katrina victims seek to sue greenhouse gas emitters the people are holding Industry culpable. What happens to the Auto Industry if cities and nations decide to favour public transport over cars? What happens to the Aerospace Industry if Goverments decide on highspeed energy efficient rail for domestic and International travel? Thats how it will roll out, thats why this debate.
Back to Top View Brian Foley's Profile Search for other posts by Brian Foley
 
tude dog
Bigger than the Beatles
(Troll Task Force)
Bigger than the Beatles
Avatar
poor me,poor me, pour me another one

Joined: 13/February/2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5700

Online Status: Offline
Posted: 06/March/2010 at 17:00 | IP Logged  |  Copy the link in order to refer to this post Quote tude dog

In this country, anybody can sue, for any reason.

This lawsuit
Brian Foley wrote:
Katrina victims seek to sue greenhouse gas emitters

Is going nowhere.

Brian Foley wrote:
What happens to the Auto Industry if cities and nations decide to favour public transport over cars?

That's easy.

People spend time sitting in their cars for hours at a time to go to and from work.

Been there, done that.

Brian Foley wrote:
What happens to the Aerospace Industry if Goverments decide on highspeed energy efficient rail for domestic and International travel?

It has to sell. It must be a better alternative than flying, otherwise people will not use it.

Back to Top View tude dog's Profile Search for other posts by tude dog Visit tude dog's Homepage
 
Brian Foley
Bigger than the Beatles
(Troll Task Force)
Bigger than the Beatles

Refuse - Resist

Joined: 27/September/2003
Location: Tasmania
Posts: 5412

Online Status: Offline
Posted: 07/March/2010 at 01:28 | IP Logged  |  Copy the link in order to refer to this post Quote Brian Foley

tude dog wrote:
This lawsuit Is going nowhere.

It does not matter whether it is going nowhere, but people,(you and some others excluded)realise that global warming or cooling is the work of large Industrial corporations.
tude dog wrote:
That's easy.

If you read what I wrote I am saying these Auto and Aerospace manufacturers stand to lose a massive amount of their market. Thats why the Global warming theory has to be 'debunked' by confusing the issue with contradictory results.
Back to Top View Brian Foley's Profile Search for other posts by Brian Foley
 
odin
Bigger than the Beatles
(Troll Task Force)
Bigger than the Beatles
Avatar
Owner of the only deleted Topic

Joined: 25/July/2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 7880

Online Status: Offline
Posted: 07/March/2010 at 20:16 | IP Logged  |  Copy the link in order to refer to this post Quote odin

The United Nations (UN) set up the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC); now a leaked briefing document reveals that the UN is basing its roadmap leading to “global governance” – a term many regard as an euphemism for World Government – on the discredited, if not fraudulent, findings of this body.

Their  policy document, which is linked to below, reveals that the UN seeks to put the foundations in place for a proposed “green world order” by 2012; this includes a “structure of global governance” to be funded by an almost unimaginable $45 trillion transfer of wealth from richer countries by 2050.

The implementation of this proposal will fulfill a long held and barely concealed objective of the globalists to centralise global power and eradicate national sovereignty.

No one seriously believed that the failure of December’s Copenhagen Conference was the end of the road for the “man-made” global warming scam; Copenhagen was just another milestone on the UN’s road to “global governance”, a road to be paid for with our taxes.


More at: http://bnp.org.uk/2010/03/the-real-purpose-of-the-united-nations%e2%80%99-ipcc-revealed/

Back to Top View odin's Profile Search for other posts by odin
 
Brian Foley
Bigger than the Beatles
(Troll Task Force)
Bigger than the Beatles

Refuse - Resist

Joined: 27/September/2003
Location: Tasmania
Posts: 5412

Online Status: Offline
Posted: 08/March/2010 at 01:00 | IP Logged  |  Copy the link in order to refer to this post Quote Brian Foley

odin wrote:

The United Nations (UN) set up the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC); now a leaked briefing document reveals that the UN is basing its roadmap leading to “global governance” – a term many regard as an euphemism for World Government – on the discredited, if not fraudulent, findings of this body.

The report reveals a growing uneasiness within the world’s ruling powers about social unrest that would come with global warming.
Back to Top View Brian Foley's Profile Search for other posts by Brian Foley
 
odin
Bigger than the Beatles
(Troll Task Force)
Bigger than the Beatles
Avatar
Owner of the only deleted Topic

Joined: 25/July/2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 7880

Online Status: Offline
Posted: 12/March/2010 at 08:41 | IP Logged  |  Copy the link in order to refer to this post Quote odin

Forty Inconvenient Truths the UN Wants to Brush under the Carpet

The news that the United Nations (UN) intends to have the findings of its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reviewed by a body it claims to be “independent”, a claim some regard as laughable, suggests that it is seeking to brush a whole raft of inconvenient facts under the carpet.

They have to do this if their programme leading to “global governance”, the erosion of national sovereignty for the world’s nation states is to stand any chance of success.

Furthermore, their plans for the greatest heist in history, the transfer of some $54 trillion from the developed nations to the Third World by 2050, necessary for the creation of what they describe as their “New Green World Order” can only succeed if the findings of the UN’s IPCC are given credibility by the UN’s choice of “independent” arbitrator.

This episode illustrates the extent to which globalist institutions such as the UN and national governments, are prepared to fabricate “evidence” to facilitate the implementation of their dishonest globalist agenda.

The following are just some of the issues and facts that the UN has to “dispose” of.

1. The head of the IPCC, Dr Rajendra Pachauri, has no background in Climate Science. His PhD is in economics and he worked as a railway engineer before becoming the head of the IPCC.

2. Only 52 scientists contributed to the 2007 IPCC summary for policy makers, although diplomats from over 115 countries contributed.

3. A paper that became a key reference source for the IPCC’s claimed that the effect of urban warming in eastern China was “negligible”. It turned out that 49 of the 84 climate monitoring stations used for the report had no history of their locations at all, meaning no one could verify where the data came from. This included 40 of the 42 rural stations. Of the rest no fewer than 18 “had been moved” during the study period to warmer urban areas. When the source data was re-examined it was found that urbanisation was responsible for 40% of the warming previously reported and claimed as evidence for “man-made” global warming.

4. When asked to independently review the IPCC’s last two reports on claimed sea-level rises, the reviewing scientist was “astonished to find that not one of their 22 contributing authors was a sea level specialist”.

5. Up until 2003, the IPCC’s satellite-based evidence showed no upward trend in sea level, so the IPCC used an increase of 2.3mm recorded on a single Hong Kong harbour tide-gauge to claim a global sea level increase of 2.3mm.

6. The IPCC’s now retracted claim that the Himalayan glaciers were melting was derived from nothing more scientific than a phone interview with someone who wasn’t even a scientist.

7. The IPCC’s now retracted claim that “man-made” global warming would lead to increasing numbers of natural disasters, such as Katrina scale hurricanes, was based on an unpublished report that had not been subjected to critical peer-review.

8. The IPCC’s now retracted claim that “man-made” global warming was going to result in deficiencies of up to 50% in African agriculture was also based on a non peer-reviewed claim in a non-scientific paper.

9. The IPCC’s now retracted claim that “up to 40%” of the Amazonian rain forest could react drastically to even a slight reduction in rainfall was based on a non-peer-reviewed non-scientific paper.

10. The IPCC’s claim that 55% of the Netherlands was below sea level, rather than the actual 26%, has now been retracted.

11. According to the United States Historical Climateology Network (USHNC) 90% of US climate-monitoring surface stations have been found to be poorly situated, meaning that they have a margin of error greater than one degree Centigrade, which is huge in climateology terms.

12. In 1978 there were 6,000 climate-monitoring surface stations; today there are only about 1,200.

13. The vast majority of lost climate monitoring stations were sited in rural areas, meaning that overall results are distorted upwards due to a much greater percentage of such stations being located in urban areas, often on top of warm office blocks.

14. Carbon dioxide contributes only 4.2% to 8.4% of the greenhouse gas effect.

15. Only approximately 4% of carbon dioxide is actually man-made.

16. Water vapour accounts for between 90% and 95% of the green house gas effect.

17. An estimated 99.99% of water vapour is natural, meaning that no amount of de-industrialisation could get rid of it.

18. There have been many times when the temperature of the planet has been higher than it is now; these include the Medieval Warming Period, the Holocene and the Jurassic periods.

19. Antarctic ice core samples prove that increases in carbon dioxide follow increases in temperature by about 800 years, not precede them as claimed by the IPCC.

20. A leading figure in the “Climategate” scandal now admits that there has been no “statistically significant” global warming since 1995.

21. 2008 and 2009 were the two coolest years of the decade, neither of which are likely to be as cold as 2010.

22. During the Ordovician period carbon dioxide concentrations were twelve times higher than what they are now – yet the temperature was lower.

23. Solar activity is highly correlated with temperature change.

24. Studies show that half of all recent warming was solar in cause.

25. The planet Mars has warmed by about half a degree Centigrade since the 1970’s, which is about as much as the Earth over the same period; as far as we are aware there is no industry on that planet.

26. The 0.7 degree Centigrade increase in temperature over the last century is entirely consistent with well-established, long-term, climate trends.

27. The distance between the Earth and the Sun varies; thus affecting the amount of heat energy the earth receives.

28. Earth’s axial tilt oscillates between 21.4 degrees and 24.8 degrees, which affects the distribution of the sun’s energy across its surface.

29. Antarctica has 90% of the earth’s ice and it is growing, not shrinking as claimed by the IPCC.

30. The Arctic sea ice has now returned to its 1979 levels, which is when monitoring began.

31. The Arctic ice caps have recovered from their loss in 2007.

32. The Arctic is now one degree Centigrade cooler than it was in the 1940’s.

33. Sea level 81,000 years ago was one metre higher than it is now while carbon dioxide levels were lower.

34. According to satellite data sea level has been decreasing since 2005.

35. Instead of damaging forests, the increased level of carbon dioxide has been helping them grow.

36. Some climate scientists argue that urban warming is responsible for half of the global warming trend from 1980 to 2002.

37. According to a leaked “Climategate” email, temperatures recorded in Darwin, Australia, were shown to be falling by 0.7 degrees Centigrade per century – but after IPCC “homogenisation” they were recorded as increasing at 1.2 degrees Centigrade per century.

38. It is alleged by Russian scientists that Britain’s Hadley Climate Research Unit “cherry picked” climate data from just 25% of Russia’s surface weather monitoring stations, thereby overstating Russia’s warming by a very significant two-thirds of a degree Centigrade for the period between the 1870’s and 1990’s.

39. It is alleged that Britain’s Hadley Climate Research Unit, the body at the centre of “Climategate”, threw out original temperature data that could have been re-examined to verify its findings, because it claimed it did not have “storage space”.

40. The owners of the trading floor where the carbon credits will be traded, allegedly including Goldman Sachs and Al Gore, stand to make trillions of dollars if cap-and-trade is passed by the US administration.

The threat to national sovereignty and the prosperity of all in the developed world from the United Nations cannot be overstated.

Back to Top View odin's Profile Search for other posts by odin
 
tude dog
Bigger than the Beatles
(Troll Task Force)
Bigger than the Beatles
Avatar
poor me,poor me, pour me another one

Joined: 13/February/2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5700

Online Status: Offline
Posted: 15/March/2010 at 08:57 | IP Logged  |  Copy the link in order to refer to this post Quote tude dog

Gee, where does the British government thinks it gets off?

Oh well, its just taxpayer money used to propagandize the taxpayer.

Government rebuked over global warming nursery rhyme adverts

Two nursery rhyme adverts commissioned bythe Government to raise awareness of climate change have been banned for overstating the risks.

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) ruled that the adverts – which were based on the children's poems Jack and Jill and Rub-A-Dub-Dub – made exaggerated claims about the threat to Britain from global warming.

In definitely asserting that climate change would cause flooding and drought the adverts went beyond mainstream scientific consensus, the watchdog said.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7440664/Government-rebuked-over-global-wa rming-nursery-rhyme-adverts.html




*********************************************************************
Message inserted by SfD invitation bot:

Been lurking for quite some time here? Then it is time now to let us know what you think!
Sign up with Studentsfordemocracy - username and password is all you need

*********************************************************************
Back to Top View tude dog's Profile Search for other posts by tude dog Visit tude dog's Homepage
 
Advertisement

Posted: Today at 07:24 | No IP  

Back to Top
 

Post Reply
Welcome guest!  Please share your opinion with us but keep in mind that your post requires authorization. That means spam will never make it to our forums!
POSTS WITH MORE THAN 5 LINKS GET AUTOMATICALLY DELETED!
*Indicates required fields
Name*:
Do the Math!
Result*:  Warning: Wrong result adds your IP to our Spam Database!
 
*Editor Preview* Want to use it? Then sign up with Students for Democracy. It is free and easy!
Message*:

Smile Tongue Wink
Cry Big smile LOL
Dead Embarrassed Confused
Clap Angry Ouch
Star Shocked Sleepy
Emoticon Set For Guests
   Enable Forum Codes to format post
 

 12 Pages  « 1 2 ... 10 11 12 »
  Select the text you want to have translated Post New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



This page was generated in 1.0605 seconds.
©2003-2011 Students for Democracy |  Site Launched:July 21, 2003

StudentsforDemocracy's validated RSS 2.0 feed

Warning: This text and the email address is not visible in a browser! Do not ever send any emails to:
cggsswfs@contact.studentsfordemocracy.net